Tools and Toys

ā€¦skip any definitive conclusions, as we know you might change those at any time. ????

@ron on micro.blog

Ron was referring to my still-forming opinions about the reMarkable tablet, but he could be referring to any number of things. I have a reputation for frequently changing up my process/tools/systems/workflows/what-have-you. This reputation is not unfounded, but for some reason I feel the need to explain (defend?) myself.

Or perhaps itā€™s easier to describe what Iā€™m not doing:

I am not looking for the perfect tool or system. I simply like to try new things.

Many people seem to assume that Iā€™m wasting time constantly searching for some better, more-perfect solution. I donā€™t believe thatā€™s it at all. Iā€™m not wasting my time, Iā€™m having fun!

Letā€™s look at note-taking and cameras as two good examples.

I donā€™t need any new note-taking tools. I donā€™t need a different process for taking notes. I donā€™t need to take ā€œsmarterā€ notes. Note-taking is a solved problem. If I want to write something down, I open a text file and write it down. Now, that could be done using Vim or BBEdit or Emacs or whatever. Doesnā€™t matter, as long as what Iā€™ve written is in a text file and I can find it later if needed. This would be different if I was an academic or an author working on a novel, but Iā€™m neither of those.

However, Iā€™m fascinated by how other people do things and the tools they use. I love seeing how different tools solve different problems for different people. I love novelty. This is why I started using Vim in the early 2000s when BBEdit worked just fine. Iā€™d heard so many people rave about modal editing with Vim that I had to try it. Turns out they were right. Modal editing has informed nearly every text-editing decision since I learned it. One canā€™t dig into Vim without also hearing about how great Emacs is. I tried and failed to get into Emacs a few times, but then Spacemacs came along and made it easy for Vim users to adapt. Then Doom replaced Spacemacs because it was simpler and faster. And one canā€™t use Emacs without running into Org mode. Then Roam showed up and made automatic backlinks a thing, and I loved that. I still do. In fact, I still enjoy using all of them: BBEdit, Roam, Vim, Emacs, Craft, Obsidian, Logseq, Mem, iA Writer, Ulysses, and on and on. Hell, I still use paper about half the time.

Itā€™s the same with cameras. I want to experience them all; big, small, cheap, expensive, old, newā€¦all of them. I have or have had some of the (objectively) ā€œbestā€ cameras ever made. (And no, the best camera is not the one you have with you if what you have with you is a shitty camera.) I donā€™t make photographs for a living, so itā€™s incorrect to describe a camera as ā€œjust a tool.ā€ For me, cameras are toys! Sure, I look for the ones that work well with the way I like to take pictures, but they all have good and bad qualities. I like trying cameras with varying combinations of those qualities.

This all happens because I want to try the things I read about. If someone writes passionately about something they use, whether it be software, hardware, or process, I want to try it for myself.

But letā€™s be clear, I donā€™t need any of it beyond a basic text editor and, say, my iPhone.

All this stuff is like a giant toy box. And much like Andy in Toy Story, sometimes I find a new favorite toy. This means that old favorites get left in the box for a time. Then one day I re-discover an old favorite and out it comes. There need not be anything ā€œdefinitiveā€ about it.

Old friends