<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>OM-2n on Baty.net</title><link>https://baty.net/tags/om-2n/</link><description>Recent content in OM-2n on Baty.net</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.157.0</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Jack Baty |</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 10:11:51 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://baty.net/tags/om-2n/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Roll-058: (OM-2n/TMAX-100)</title><link>https://baty.net/2022/roll-058-om-2n-tmax-100/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 10:11:51 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://baty.net/2022/roll-058-om-2n-tmax-100/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I ran a roll of TMAX-100 through the Olympus OM-2n. As always, I had the lovely 85mm Zuiko attached. This time, I also strapped on the flash.&lt;figure class="wp-block-image size-large"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img loading="lazy" width="1024" height="684" src="https://baty.net/img/2022/02/20220222-Q1000334.jpg" alt="" /&gt;
&lt;figcaption&gt;Olympus OM-2n with flash. (Leica Q2 Monochrom)&lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;/figure&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was not a successful roll. Maybe three images were salvageable. Why did it have to be shots like this?&lt;figure class="wp-block-image size-large"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img loading="lazy" width="1024" height="683" src="https://baty.net/img/2022/02/2022-Roll-58_01.jpg" alt="" /&gt;
&lt;figcaption&gt;Making dinner. (Olympus OM-2n. Zuiko 85mm f/2. TMAX-100.)&lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;/figure&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or this one of Charlie, which was typically mis-focused. I may need to try a new focusing screen.&lt;figure class="wp-block-image size-large"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><content:encoded> <![CDATA[<p>I ran a roll of TMAX-100 through the Olympus OM-2n. As always, I had the lovely 85mm Zuiko attached. This time, I also strapped on the flash.<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"></p>
<img loading="lazy" width="1024" height="684" src="/img/2022/02/20220222-Q1000334.jpg" alt=""  />
<figcaption>Olympus OM-2n with flash. (Leica Q2 Monochrom)</figcaption></figure> 
<p>It was not a successful roll. Maybe three images were salvageable. Why did it have to be shots like this?<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"></p>
<img loading="lazy" width="1024" height="683" src="/img/2022/02/2022-Roll-58_01.jpg" alt=""  />
<figcaption>Making dinner. (Olympus OM-2n. Zuiko 85mm f/2. TMAX-100.)</figcaption></figure> 
<p>Or this one of Charlie, which was typically mis-focused. I may need to try a new focusing screen.<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"></p>
<img loading="lazy" width="1024" height="659" src="/img/2022/02/2022-Roll-58_28.jpg" alt=""  />
<figcaption>Charlie. (Olympus OM-2n. Zuiko 85mm f/2. TMAX-100.)</figcaption></figure>
<div id="reply-by-email">
    <a
        class="reply-by-email"
        href="mailto:jack@baty.net?subject=[baty.net] Re: Roll-058%3a%20%28OM-2n%2fTMAX-100%29"
        data-meta="46736254466c76526e706a664549624e455d711469636e4c406c4f51464972146e706a634717724d4549724e4067715e76626e486e706a666e706d5377777262694d7110696771116b735c576e706d537d497148694e6617457c764b7e6c6e4c401648517e5d715d69637e5d46161448694e665e46166a547d735348694e66507e7376547d77715d755d715d69637e52474d715d69636148694e6617456348577e77715d755d715d69677262694d7110696772666a431919"
        >✍️ Reply by email</a
    >
</div>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>