If there are āNotesā listed under this post, it means the thing Iāve been working on here isā¦working, I guess.
(Update, theyāre missing from the RSS feed. Iāll work on that later.)
Trusting your own judgement on āAIā is a huge risk:
Something seemingly working is not evidence of it working.
(Long, but worth reading).
I dunno, seems to me that if itās working, itās working, but I suppose thatās his point. One can argue that AI is bad for the environment, or bad for artists, or stealing, and youād have a point. But when you argue that āWell, it doesnāt actually work. It canāt think!ā then thatās where we part company. Even though I agree with a lot of the article, itās the kind of thing someone writes when they really really donāt wanāt something to be true. I swear Iām going to stop commenting on all this nonsense and go back to the super-cool homeopathic software I co-wrote (aka āvibe-codedā) today. You know, the one thatās working. I donāt need to prove anything to you.
...